Notice: GIFT website is under migration process for new website and all the process related are affected during this time. Please accept our sincere apologies for the inconviniences caused.

Kerala Economy Journal

Home » Journal

Disquieting tumble in state revenues of southern states

Authors: Anitha Kumary L , Parma Chakravartti | Published on: 13-Dec-2020

English PDF

Abstract

Among the southern states, Kerala recorded the highest decline in own tax revenue (-31.5%), non-tax revenue (-75.6%) and share in central taxes during the first half of 2020.
Capital expenditure showed a positive growth only in two states, Andhra Pradesh (165.2%) and Kerala (22.1%) with a negative growth in rest of the southern states during H1 2020 vis-à-vis H1 2019.
Borrowing showed a positive growth in all the southern states with an increase of  more than 200 per cent  in Karnataka (450.6%) and Andhra Pradesh (230.2%) while the others recorded less than 100 per cent growth during H1 (Telangana (76.7%), Kerala (58.4%) and Tamil Nadu (55.9%).

 

Full Content

An economy is said to be in recession when there is a significant decline in general economic activity in two consecutive quarters. The negative GDP growth (-13.3%) in India during first half of the current  fiscal resulting from -23.9 per cent  growth in Q1 and -7.5 per cent growth in Q2, (NAS, 2020-21), undoubtedly implies a recession. Such a context calls for an activist role for the state inter alia for reviving the economy and help those affected by the recession. The state's ability to intervene, however, is contingent on the fiscal position of the state.  How has the observed recessionary trends at national and sub-national levels affected the state's fiscal position? This article explores this question by analysing revenue, expenditure, borrowing and deficit of Kerala in a comparative perspective with other southern states- Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Telangana, and Tamil Nadu. Since we have already dealt with the fiscal position in Q1,2020 (Anitha Kumary and Chakravartti, 2020), the focus here shall be on first half (H1) of the current fiscal as compared to H1 in 2019. We shall also highlight the changes in Q2 as compared to Q1
Government receipts
The southern states in general recorded a decline in the overall revenue receipts (comprising of own tax revenue, own non-tax revenue, share in central taxes and grants-in-aid) during the first half of the current fiscal as compared to the corresponding period in the previous year. The largest fall in revenue receipts is observed in Karnataka (-22.5%) followed by Tamil Nadu (-19%), Kerala (-17.9%), Andhra Pradesh (-14.6%) and Telangana (-14.4%) (Appendix Table A1). Here it is important to note that the recorded negative growth in revenue in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana is on par with the fall in GDP growth at the national level whereas the decline in revenue growth in Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Kerala was much higher when compared to the GDP growth.
Both own tax revenue and non-tax revenue growth shows a decrease in all the states with a steepest fall in own tax revenue growth observed in Kerala of -31.5 per cent during H1 2020 from H1 2019, then in Tamil Nadu (-26.7%), Andhra Pradesh (-26.2%), Karnataka (-23.4%) and Telangana (-13.1%).The decline in own non-tax revenue growth is observed to be highest in Kerala of -75.6 per cent followed by Tamil Nadu (-37.6%), Telangana (-30%), Karnataka (-19%) and then Andhra Pradesh (-9.4 %) during H1 2020 with respect to H1 2019. State's share of central taxes have strikingly registered a fall for all the states with a steepest fall in Karnataka (-38.4 %) and Kerala (-38.1 %).  With the negative growth in own tax revenue, non-tax revenue and share in central taxes, the fall in the aggregate revenue receipts would have been at a more severe degree without the positive growth in grants-in-aid and contributions in all the states except Karnataka (Appendix Table A1).
Capital receipts comprising of recovery of loans and advances, other receipts and borrowings and other liabilities show a positive growth in all the states contributed by maximum positive growth in borrowings and other liabilities (Appendix Table A1).
Disaggregating the half-yearly analysis into first and second quarter we observed that the performance of all the states have improved in terms of revenue receipts growth except in Andhra Pradesh during Q2 compared to Q1. Even though the growth in revenue receipts is decreasing in Q2, the extent of fall as compared to Q1 has reduced with a better performance observed in Kerala (Appendix Table A1).
Government expenditure
The total expenditure consisting of revenue and capital expenditure shows a positive growth in three states, Andhra Pradesh (55 per cent), Telangana (9.8 per cent) and Kerala (3.9 per cent) during H1 2020 vis-à-vis 2019 with a negative growth registered in Karnataka (-8.5 per cent) and in Tamil Nadu (-6.5 per cent). Positive growth in both revenue and capital expenditure is noted in the same states having positive growth in total expenditure and it is similar for the states having negative growth. Highest revenue expenditure growth is observed in Andhra Pradesh (48.4 per cent), Telangana (12.9 per cent) and in Kerala (2.5 per cent). Revenue expenditure on subsidies registered a highest growth in Kerala of 217.4 per cent during H1 2020 compared to 2019 (Appendix Table A1). It indicates the state's timely response to safeguard the lives and livelihood of the people during the COVID-19 pandemic by disbursing welfare pensions, payment of relief  to BPL families, providing financial aid through Welfare fund boards, providing food security to all including migrant workers through starting community kitchens, distribution of free ration to all categories of ration card holders, financial support to the health sector, micro credit to Kudumbashree groups, providing free food kits so on and so forth (Government of Kerala, 2020).
The capital expenditure shows a positive growth only in two states, Andhra Pradesh (165.2 per cent) and Kerala (22.1 per cent) with a negative growth in rest of the southern states during H1 2020 vis-à-vis 2019 (Appendix Table A1)
Total state government expenditure during Q2, 2020 over 2019 registered a fall in growth rate in all southern states except in Andhra Pradesh.This decrease in aggregate expenditure growth is accompanied by a decrease in revenue expenditure growth in the states implying the restriction, states are having on the fiscal space. A positive growth is observed in capital expenditure for all states except for Tamil Nadu during Q2 2020 vis-à-vis 2019 indicating that the states are implementing measures for revival of economic growth. Government of Kerala had initiated an alternative mode for financing capital investment over and above the budgeted capital expenditure.
Financing capital expenditure in Kerala
The basic difference in the pattern of expenditure of Kerala lies in the substantially higher share of social and community services in the total expenditure compared to the share of economic services. This difference in priorities in state's expenditure led the Kerala model of development (George, 1993). As a result, Kerala is having high committed expenditures like salary, pension and interest payments leading to perennial revenue deficit. The balance from state's own revenue is almost nil for meeting capital expenditure. A major portion of borrowing (within the FRBM limit) has been utilized for adjusting revenue deficit. It is evident from Table 1 that the capital investment in Kerala was only 0.9 per cent of GSDP in 2013-14 and marginally declined to 0.8 per cent in 2014-15. In 2015-16, a small increase of 1.3 per cent based on fiscal rule based conditionalities. Even if we include the development fund transfers to local governments, (lion share of it is being invested as road and non road assets) the capital investments come only around 2 per cent of GSDP. Under this context, Government of Kerala in 2016-17 budget, revamped the then existing Kerala Infrastructure Investment Fund Board (KIIFB) and started mobilizing funds for investment.

Table 1.Capital expenditure in Kerala (Rs. crore)

Year

Capital Outlay(1)

GSDP(2)

Capital Outlay as a percent of GSDP(3)

Development exp to local governments (4)

Col 1 plus Col 4 (5) 

Col 5 as a per cent of GSDP

2013-14

4294

465041

0.9

4012.2

8306.2

1.8

2014-15

4255

526002

0.8

5266.5

9521.5

1.8

2015-16

7500

561994

1.3

3060.9

10560.9

1.9

2016-17

10126

634886

1.6

4182.6

14308.6

2.3

2017-18

8749

701577

1.2

5752.2

14501.2

2.1

2018-19

7431

781653

1

6197.5

13628.5

1.7

2019-20 (RE)

8013

871534

0.9

6816.4

14829.8

1.7

2020-21(B.E)

12913

978064

1.3

7864.5

20777.7

2.1

Source: Budget in Brief, Government of Kerala, various issues
 

KIIFB came into existence on 11.11.1999 under the Kerala Infrastructure Investment Fund Act 1999 to manage the Kerala Infrastructure Investment Fund. KIIFB has been functioning as the key Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) for mobilising and channeling the funds to the various infrastructure SPVs outside the Budget of Government of Kerala. The other operations of the KIIFB are mobilising funds through KSFE, NRI Chitty, KIIFB -Masala Bond Issuance, availing Term Loans from various banks worth Rs.3000 crore and setting up of Infrastructure Fund Management Company.
Presently, KIIFB acts as the main arm of Government to facilitate planned, hassle-free and sustained development of both physical and social infrastructure badly needed in the state for generating employment and income opportunities in the state. Borrowing for capital investment is being done through KIIFB. Better borrow today and pay only the interest rather than paying for inflation, other cost escalation and interest by postponing investment.
Though the investments of KIIFB are from off budget borrowing, a provision has been made for transferring petroleum cess and a portion of tax revenue from motor vehicle tax to KIIFB. Accordingly, 10 per cent of the vehicle tax in the initial year (2016-17), 20 per cent in the second year, 30 per cent in the third year, 40 per cent in the fourth year and 50 per cent thereafter will be transferred. An annuity scheme is being introduced to address the repayment of loans by the state. Based on the annuity scheme the cost of the activities undertaken through KIIFB will be repaid by the Government within a period of 15 to 20 years especially for the investments of low return making assets like education, health, public works etc. The contractors are allowed to fix the rate by considering the interest and maintenance of the period concerned.
Projects initiated by KIIFB
From 2016-17, KIIFB has approved funding of projects worth Rs.42306.1 crore as on 31-03-2019 (Annual Report, KIIFB, 2018-19). The projects initiated by KIIFB are spread over almost all the sectors of Kerala economy. As of now,  KIIFB initiated 2228 projects across 26 departments. Highest number of projects is being initiated in General Education Department.   Public works Department, Water Resources Department, Fisheries Department, Health and Family Welfare Department are placed in second, third, fourth and fifth positions respectively (Box A).  These projects are spread out in all the 14 districts and in 140 constituencies of Kerala. The timely successful completion of these projects is crucial for the infrastructural development of Kerala. Any slackness in undertaking already sanctioned projects of KIIFB due to unanticipated reasons could affect adversely the infrastructural needs amidst of the financial crisis of the state.

 

Box A KIIFB projects under various Departments

SL.No.

Departments having KIIFB projects                     

No of Projects

1

Agricultual Department    

4

2

Ayush Department

1

3

Backward class development Department

1

4

Coastal Shipping and Navigation Department

9

5

Cultural Affairs Department

24

6

Dewasom Department

26

7

Fisheries Department

167

8

Forest and Wild Life Department

6

9

General Education Department

644

10

Health and Family Welfare Department

121

11

Higher Education Department

96

12

Home Department

6

13

Industries Department

9

14

Information Technology Department

2

15

Labour and Skill Development

13

16

Local Self Government Department

45

17

Power Department

61

18

Public Works Department

636

19

Registration Department

39

20

Revenue Department

2

21

Schedule Caste Development Department

10

22

Sports ad Youth Affairs Department

55

23

Tourism Department

27

24

Transport Department

4

25

Water Resource Department

198

26

SC Department

22

 

Reference

Anitha Kumary L and  Parma Chakravartti (2020)."Kerala Economy:State of State Finances, Kerala Economy", GIFT, Thiruvananthapuram, November 2020.
Comptroller and Auditor General of India(2019 to 2020).  "State Accounts: Monthly Key Indicators. https://cag.gov.in/en/state-accounts-report.
George K K (1993). "Limits to Kerala Model of Development:An analysis of fiscal crisis and its implications", Centre for Development Studies, Thiruvananthapuram
Government of India (2020). "National Accounts Statistics", National Statistical Office, Ministry of Statistics &Programme Implementation, 2020-21
Government of Kerala (2020). "COVID-19 Pandemic and Kerala: A Response Strategy", June 2020, Finance Department, Thiruvanan thapuram
Kerala Infrastructure Investment Fund Board (2018-19). "Fidelity Certificate, Annual Report & Annual Accounts for the Financial Year 2018-19", www.kiifb.org
RBI (2020). "StateFinances: A Study of Budgets of 2020-21" Reserve Bank of India, October 2020
Tarschys D. (1983). "The Scissors Crisis in Public Finance", Policy Sciences, Apr. 1983, Vol. 15, No. 3